Exposure to hazardous asbestos can be lethal. There are a myriad of studies that investigate the links between exposure and disease development. One interesting study is called, Vitronectin enhances internalization of crocidolite asbestos by rabbit pleural mesothelial cells via the integrin alpha v beta by A. M. Boylan, D. A. Sanan, D Sheppard, and V. C. Broaddus - Department of Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, California 94110, USA - J Clin Invest. 1995 October; 96(4): 19872001. Here is an excerpt: Abstract - The mechanism by which pleural mesothelial cells, the likely progenitor cells of asbestos-induced mesothelioma, recognize and internalize crocidolite asbestos is unknown. Because incubation of asbestos fibers with serum increases their association with cells, we asked whether a protein coat on asbestos increased internalization of fibers via specific cellular receptors. Coating crocidolite with citronectin, but not with fibronectin or other proteins, increased fiber internalization by rabbit pleural mesothelial cells, as measured by a new technique using fluorescence confocal microscopy. Receptors for vitronectin, alpha v beta 3 and alpha v beta 5, were identified on mesothelial cells. Inhibiting vitronectin receptors by plating cells on a vitronectin substrate or incubating cells with excess soluble vitronectin reduced internalization of vitronectin-coated crocidolite. Inhibition of alpha v beta 5, but not alpha v beta 3, with blocking antibodies similarly reduced internalization. In addition, alpha v beta 5, but not alpha v beta 3, showed immunocytochemical colocalization with fibers. Of biologic relevance, coating crocidolite with serum also increased internalization via alpha v beta 5, an effect dependent on the vitronectin in serum. We conclude that pleural mesothelial cells recognize and internalize vitronectin- and serum-coated asbestos via the integrin alpha v beta 5. Since integrins initiate some of the same signaling pathways as does asbestos, our findings may provide insights into the mechanisms of asbestos-induced biologic effects.
A second study is called, The epidemiology of Mesothelioma by Mark Britton - Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 18-25 (February 2002) - seminars in oncology. Here is an excerpt: Abstract - It has been more than 40 years since occupational crocidolite exposure in South African miners was found to be associated with development of malignant mesothelial tumors 30 to 40 years later. Similar cases were not seen in the amosite and chrysotile miners. Since then, epidemiological and toxicological knowledge have increased enormously, but mortality continues to rise steeply (5% to 10% per year) in most industrialized countries. Even with widespread asbestos abatement efforts, this increase is likely to continue in Western Europe and the United State well into the next century, at least until 2020. Unregulated use of asbestos in less industrialized countries may cause the epidemic to continue throughout the next century in those regions. Asbestos abatement seems to be successful as evidenced by a decline in the proportion of patients with peritoneal tumors, which are the most common malignancies in heavily exposed individuals. Whereas in the 1960s peritoneal tumors comprised up to 30% of the total, in recent years the proportion has fallen to about 10%, This changing ratio could also be due to the steady increase in pleural tumors. The difficulty in formulating the connection as to the etiology of mesothelioma resulted from an unforeseeable difference in the carcinogenicity of various asbestos and mineral fiber types and was compounded by the very long latency of the disease. Unfortunately, the use of a single term, asbestos, to describe at least five fibrous silicate minerals, each with unique physical, chemical, and biological properties and not infrequently and naturally admixed, severely hampered scientific investigation into the occupational health risks. The field became confused and filled with debate. At the heart of the fiber type controversy lies a fundamentally differing view of the importance of biopersistence of various asbestos fibers in carcinogenesis. This review will deal with the epidemiology of mesothelioma with particular attention to the studies that elucidate the impact of various asbestos fiber types on the etiology of the disease. Semin Oncol 29:18-25.
If you found any of these studies interesting, please read them in their entirety. We all owe a great deal of thanks to the people who are researching these important issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment